That’s according to a recent investigation by the National Association of Specialist Dental Accountants and Lawyers (NASDAL). This sees an even greater increase than in 2014 when NASDAL last ran such an investigation (and a figure of 845 per cent).
The investigation found that the advent of the Care Quality Commission (CQC), HTM01-05 and a ‘culture of compliance’ had increased dentists’ costs massively.
Back in the mid-2000s, the essential requirements for setting up in practice were a one off registration fee to the General Dental Council and an annual retention fee and registration with the Information Commissioner’s Office. The scene is now very different.
In 2016, it has been estimated that it costs a single handed practitioner £15,150 on an annual basis to meet the requirements of CQC and compliance alone. Combined with the various mandatory registration fees and indemnity, the figure reaches £21,875, an overall percentage increase in the cost of compliance of 1086 per cent, compared to general inflation over the same period of 35 per cent.
Nick Ledingham, chairman of NASDAL and a partner in specialist dental accountants Morris and Co, said, “While there has had to be a certain amount of conjecture in calculating staffing costs and training in an average practice, we have strived to be conservative throughout this investigation. We hope that by demonstrating the burden of costs faced by practice owners that sensible policy decisions will be made.”
The estimated annual costs of compliance includes the time the team spends on decontamination and maintaining records, data protection and financial compliance, as well as any time spent upon administration and staff training.
When asked to comment on the figures, Simon Thackeray, full time practitioner and occasional CQC special advisor said, “It now seems that almost every meeting that I have will involve some element of compliance. It can be difficult to carry out a complete time and motion study but I think it is not unreasonable to suggest that one full day of a full time member of staff’s week will be spent dealing with compliance related issues.
“The cost of indemnity has more than doubled in a three year period. These seem to be spiralling out of control as our society becomes more litigious and we are able to offer more and more advanced treatments.”
Comparative Table - Compliance costs for a sole practitioner in 2006 and then in 2016.
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
£ |
|
|
|
£ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDC |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
890 |
|
Indemnity |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
5,800 |
|
CQC |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
|
(introduced in 2011) |
|
(for registration alone) |
||||
Compliance |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
14,400 |
|
ICO |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost |
|
|
|
1,844 |
|
|
|
21,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan Suggett, media officer of NASDAL and a partner in UNW LLP, added, “No-one is questioning the need for adequate safeguards and professional practice. However, it seems that in the last 10 years or so, a ‘culture of compliance’ has sprung up which seems to see compliance as an end in itself.”