GDC erasure

14 May 2013
Volume 29 · Issue 5

An appeal by a General Dental Council (GDC) registrant who was struck off last year has been dismissed by the Court of Session.

David Black (Registration No: 43666) appeared before the dental regulator’s Professional Conduct Committee (PCC) in June 2012 and faced allegations of failing to have had indemnity insurance in place for more than 30 years.

The PCC took the decision that erasure was the only appropriate and proportionate outcome.

Black appealed that decision and on April 30, 2013 his case was heard by the Court of Session.

The ‘Opinion of the Court’ was delivered by Lord Bracadale and it took the view that the PCC’s decision was correct.

Paragraphs 23 and 24 of the judgement said:

"Nonetheless, the fact that Parliament has considered it appropriate to introduce legislation making the requirement for insurance a statutory requirement is indicative of how
seriously the matter is taken.

It seems clear to us that, at the latest by 1997, it was plain that the requirement for insurance cover was mandatory.  In our opinion, the committee was entitled to conclude that the General Dental Council had been clear in its guidance since November 1997 that membership of a defence organisation or indemnity insurance was obligatory.  Having regard to the specialist nature of the committee we are unable to criticise its conclusion that the requirement was a mandatory ethical requirement and that a majority of the profession would find such a lack of membership or indemnity insurance deplorable.  The committee was entitled to conclude that as the appellant had treated patients while disregarding the respondent’s standards on this point his actions amounted to misconduct.  Before us that was accepted on behalf of the appellant."

Neil Marshall, director of regulation at the GDC said:

"We take the issue of registrants not having appropriate indemnity insurance in place  extremely seriously. Patients have a right to be able to claim any compensation they may be  entitled to if something goes wrong. By not having cover in place Black left his patients seriously disadvantaged for many years."

The GDC has had measures in place for more than two decades requiring dentists to have adequate indemnity or insurance in place to ensure patients can claim compensation if something goes wrong.

What our current standards say dental professionals must do:

"1.6 Make sure your patients are able to claim any compensation they may be entitled to by making sure you are protected against claims at all times, including past periods of practice."